Antitrust
Antitrust disputes are different because a case may involve private claims and agency pressure at the same time. The market effect may start before the merits are resolved. Stone Hilton handles antitrust fights where the legal theory is tied to how the market works.
Competition is the point of the case.
Antitrust claims usually allege that the conduct changed the market itself. The dispute may focus on a pricing restraint or an exclusionary practice. In some matters, the question is whether a deal would give one company too much control.
That makes the proof different. The record often turns on market definition and what the conduct actually did to competition. Internal business records may supply much of that proof.
If the real issue is fraud or interference, that is a business tort problem. If the fight is really over payment or a failed deal, that is a business & commercial disputes problem.
